Summit meeting: Past, future merge on mountain Bret Bradigan - publisher - From my view - Eastern Arizona Courier August 18, 1999 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Views are stunning from Mount Graham's peak. Mid-monsoon greenery unfolding toward the distant gray serrated ridgelines washes away in waves of beauty the thin veneer of civilized cares. Lost in the moment, you can easily forget what century you are in. That is, of course, until you realize you are surrounded by many millions of dollars of the world's finest optical and radio equipment, designed to peer into the very dawn of creation. The University of Arizona and the Vatican observatories are by no means invisible, and the site of underconstruction Large Binocular Telescope can be jarring after the trip up the mountain. But given the nature, and, pardon the word play, scope of the projects, it is evident that much care has gone into minimizing the disturbances. It is a testimony to the care of construction that you can lose yourself in wildness while surrounded by all this progress. Such is the visual irony of the Mount Graham Telescope Project- an island of science, surrounded by a land of harsh and primitive majesty. My first trip to the project coincided with the Apaches' Sacred Run from San Carlos to Mount Graham's summit for a ceremony and protest. This juxtaposition of events exposes my profound division of allegiances. I want them both to win. I want the Apaches' cultural traditions to be restored, revived and revered. I want the telescope project to peel back the layers of our ignorance on a cosmic scale. I want technology and tradition, science and religion, to find their perfect balance. Amid all this furor, I even want those benighted squirrels to thrive. I hate, it when decent, well-meaning people find themselves bitterly opposed. Most of all, I hate knowing that this happens far too often. Stephen Jay Gould recently composed an elegant book that tries to bridge that gulf between faith and empiricism. He believes that science and religion are separate but equal realms, which he calls Magisterium. One cannot preclude, nor exclude, the other. What comes from faith speaks to the mystery of our hearts and souls. What comes from science brings the mysteries of the universe into our grasp. Without one, our lives would be devoid of meaning and purpose. Without the other, we would be huddled in caves, swaddled in furs, and dying from toothaches. My worry is that science appears to be losing ground. For every telescope project that proceeds amid the fury of protest, there is a place like Kansas, where legislators relegate the teaching of evolution to the back of the class. It is not my intent to engage in that debate, only to say that reasonable people of all points of view have been excluded from the discussion, forced out by fire breathing zealots. This has happened on all manner of issues around here, from wolf reintroduction to cattle grazing to rural versus urban growth issues. The middle ground is fast becoming scorched and barren earth. Still, I cannot resign myself to a future of endless conflict. Galileo was imprisoned nearly 400 years ago by the Vatican for the impertinence of insisting that the earth moved around the sun. Today, at their own leading-edge telescope, priests of the Holy See are the ones bringing knowledge back from the frontiers of space. That's the kind of irony that should give us all hope.